Talk:Lv0: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 0x0C || eid0 | | 0x0C || eid0 | ||
|- | |||
| 0x0D || ? | |||
|- | |- | ||
| 0x0E || metldr.2 | | 0x0E || metldr.2 | ||
|- | |||
| 0x0F || lv1ldr.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 0x10 || lv2ldr.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 0x11 || appldr.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 0x12 || isoldr.2 | |||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:25, 13 December 2017
stupid newssites are morons : they list newer firmwares lv0 decrypted as 'news', because the static (never changed!) key can be used to decrypt it. /rant
+1. The minds of media today.. D:
there is no ECDSA verification in LV0! still some ppl keep parroting it over and over.
Component Manager[edit source]
Can handle components by IDs, differs between firmwares.
| Component ID | Name |
|---|---|
| 0x00 | metldr |
| 0x01 | lv1ldr |
| 0x02 | lv2ldr |
| 0x03 | appldr |
| 0x04 | isoldr |
| 0x05 | rvkldr |
| 0x06 | lv1.self |
| 0x07 | parm.txt |
| 0x08 | sysctl.txt |
| 0x09 | sdk_version |
| 0x0A | ? |
| 0x0B | ? |
| 0x0C | eid0 |
| 0x0D | ? |
| 0x0E | metldr.2 |
| 0x0F | lv1ldr.2 |
| 0x10 | lv2ldr.2 |
| 0x11 | appldr.2 |
| 0x12 | isoldr.2 |