Talk:RSX: Difference between revisions

From PS3 Developer wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Tag: Replaced
 
(24 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Does anyone have any info on the supposedly broken scaler? [[User:Asdfsfs|Asdfsfs]] ([[User talk:Asdfsfs|talk]]) 00:59, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Info request:
*Pad/Pinouts are unknown (just as from Cell)
*Pictures of RSX and pictures of the PCB under the RSX would be nice to add.
<pre>
1  +1.8V RSX_PLL_VDD  7      style="color:white; background-color:#ff3333;" | +1.8V RSX_PLL_VDD
2  +1.2V RSX_VDDC      6      style="color:white; background-color:#993333;" | +1.2V RSX_VDDC
3  +1.2V RSX_VDDR      5      style="color:white; background-color:#993333;" | +1.2V RSX_VDDR
4  +1.2V YC_RC_VDDIO  4      style="color:white; background-color:#993333;" | +1.2V YC_RC_VDDIO
5  +1.5V RSX_RC_VDDA  3      style="color:white; background-color:#cc3333;" | +1.5V RSX_RC_VDDA
6  +1.5V RSX_VDDIO    2      style="color:white; background-color:#cc3333;" | +1.5V RSX_VDDIO
7  +1.8V RSX_FBVDDQ    1      style="color:white; background-color:#ff3333;" | +1.8V RSX_FBVDDQ
        Ground                style="color:white; background-color:#333333;" | Ground
== Thermo experiments ==
Some I2C thermo experiments from Cell/RSX/board are referenced here: http://stefde69.blogspot.com/2011_05_01_archive.html
== Rom Versions ==
== Rom Versions ==
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! Rom Version !! RSX Serial !! PS3 Model !! PS3 Prod. Date !! Notes
! Rom Version !! RSX Serial !! PS3 Model !! PS3 Prod. Date !! Notes
Line 57: Line 35:
| colspan="5" |
| colspan="5" |
|-
|-
| rsx65 a03 || [[CXD2991GB]] || [[DEH-FH1500J-A]] || April 2008 ||
| rsx65 a03 || <strike>[[CXD2991GB]]</strike><br>CXD2982xxx || [[DEH-FH1500J-A]] || April 2008 ||
|-
|-
| rowspan="2" | rsx65 a06 || ? || [[DECR-1400]] || June 2009 ||
| rowspan="2" | rsx65 a06 || rowspan="2" | CXD2991xxx ? || [[DECR-1400]] || June 2009 ||
|-
|-
| ? || [[DECH-20xx]] || September 2009 ||
| [[DECH-20xx]] || September 2009 ||
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
| colspan="5" |
| colspan="5" |
|-
|-
| rsx40 a01 || ? || [[CECH-25xx]] || ? ||
| rsx40 a01 || CXD5300xxx<br>and<br>CXD5301xxx || [[CECH-25xx]]<br>[[CECH-30xx]] || ? || And [[CECH-21xx]] ?
|-
| rsx40 ??? || CXD5302xxx || [[CECH-40xx]] || ? || First RSX model without IHS
|-
| rsx28 ??? || D5305x || [[CECH-43xx]] || ? || First RSX model with only 2 VRAM chips instead of 4
|-
|-
|}
|}
== RSX pages organization at june 2021 ==
A template with the pinout has been added in all the pages for the RSX models made at 90nm, 65nm, and 40nm. There was some other minor problems in them because was made in different ways, one was a redirect, others was 99% empty, others not created yet, etc... Also in many of them there was a line with the compete list of RSX models made in the same nanometers (i think this is redundant because appears at the page footer). Anyway, now all the RSX pages (except 28nm) shares the same style and are made in the same way. This update was mostly a cleanup of what we have, keep in mind that is good to have a dedicated page for each incase someone wants to go picky with the details of that specific RSX model, to add photos of it, etc..., from this point we can discuss if there are better ways to reorganize them but this would be an upgrade, not neccesarilly to do it now--[[User:Sandungas|Sandungas]] ([[User talk:Sandungas|talk]]) 18:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
*CXD2971 Series (90nm)
**[[CXD2971GB]]{{dot}}[[CXD2971AGB]]{{dot}}[[CXD2971BGB]]{{dot}}[[CXD2971DGB]]. Doubtful: ([[CXD297BGB]] <abbr title="Is missing an 1">notes</abbr>){{dot}}([[CXD2971-1GB]] <abbr title="Non-retail ?">notes</abbr>)
*CXD2982 Series (65nm)
**[[CXD2982GB]]{{dot}}[[CXD2982BGB]]. Doubtful: ([[CXD2982]] <abbr title="Is missing the suffix, all the others have it">notes</abbr>)
*CXD2991 Series (65nm)
**[[CXD2991GB]]{{dot}}[[CXD2991BGB]]{{dot}}[[CXD2991CGB]]{{dot}}[[CXD2991EGB]]{{dot}}[[CXD2991GGB]]
*CXD5300 Series (40nm)
**[[CXD5300AGB]]{{dot}}[[CXD5300A1GB]]{{dot}}[[CXD5300CGB]]{{dot}}[[CXD5300DGB]]
*CXD5301 Series (40nm)
**[[CXD5301A1GB]]{{dot}}[[CXD5301DGB]]
*CXD5302 Series (40nm)
**[[CXD5302A1GB]]{{dot}}[[CXD5302DGB]]
*[[D5305]] Series (28nm)
**[[D5305A]]{{dot}}[[D5305B]]{{dot}}[[D5305C]]{{dot}}[[D5305F]]{{dot}}[[D5305K]]{{dot}}[[D5305L]]
== RSX series missing ==
In the transistion from RSX 40nm to 28nm sony removed the prefix "CX" and reduced the suffix "xxxx" (4 optional characters in chronological order: GB -> AGB -> BGB -> CGB, etc...) to "x" (only 1 character, in chronological order: A, B, C, etc...) in the name<br>
It seems the real reason why sony shorted the name this way is because in the 28nm DIE there is not enought room to etch the complete name, compare the different styles and font sizes in between [[Media:RSX_CXD5302DGB_with_HYNIX_H5RS5223DFR_in_CECH-4001B_MSX-001.jpg|40nm]] with [[Media:RSX_D5305L_with_elpida_W1132BBBG_in_CECH-43xx_REX-001.jpg|28nm]]<br>
So we can consider the '''D5305x''' used in the latest superslims is a '''CXD5305xxxx''' and is following the same numerical sequence than the previous RSX series, the list we have is:
*CXD'''2971'''xxxx
*CXD'''2982'''xxxx
*CXD'''2991'''xxxx
*CXD'''5300'''xxxx
*CXD'''5301'''xxxx
*CXD'''5302'''xxxx
*<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5305'''x<span style="color:#bbb">xxx</span>
But this sequence indicates there is a mistery, because there are 2 series missing (5301 -> 5302 -> '''5303''' -> '''5304''' -> 5305), either is like this:
*CXD'''2971'''xxxx
*CXD'''2982'''xxxx
*CXD'''2991'''xxxx
*CXD'''5300'''xxxx
*CXD'''5301'''xxxx
*CXD'''5302'''xxxx
*CXD'''5303'''xxxx <--- undocumented / prototype ('''41x41''' pad layout, 4*64MB VRAM)
*CXD'''5304'''xxxx <--- undocumented / prototype ('''41x41''' pad layout, 4*64MB VRAM)
*<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5305'''x<span style="color:#bbb">xxx</span>
Or like this
*CXD'''2971'''xxxx
*CXD'''2982'''xxxx
*CXD'''2991'''xxxx
*CXD'''5300'''xxxx
*CXD'''5301'''xxxx
*CXD'''5302'''xxxx
*<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5303'''x<span style="color:#bbb">xxx</span> <--- undocumented / prototype ('''34x34''' pad layout, 2*128MB VRAM)
*<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5304'''x<span style="color:#bbb">xxx</span> <--- undocumented / prototype ('''34x34''' pad layout, 2*128MB VRAM)
*<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5305'''x<span style="color:#bbb">xxx</span>

Latest revision as of 15:15, 31 March 2023

Rom Versions[edit source]

Rom Version RSX Serial PS3 Model PS3 Prod. Date Notes
a01 ? DEH-R1000? ?
DEH-R1010? ?
a02 ? DEH-R1020? ?
b01? CXD2971GB? DEH-R1030? ?
b01 CXD2971GB DEH-H1001-D June 2006 DEH-H1000A-D
DEH-R1040 June 2006
DECR-1000 June/July/August 2006
DEH-H1000A-E August 2006
b02 DECR-1000 ?
b03 DECR-1000 January 2007
b07 CXD2971GB? DECR-1000 ?
b08 ? CECHAxx ?
DECHAxx January 2007
rsx65 a03 CXD2991GB
CXD2982xxx		 DEH-FH1500J-A April 2008
rsx65 a06 CXD2991xxx ? DECR-1400 June 2009
DECH-20xx September 2009
rsx40 a01 CXD5300xxx
and
CXD5301xxx		 CECH-25xx
CECH-30xx		 ? And CECH-21xx ?
rsx40 ??? CXD5302xxx CECH-40xx ? First RSX model without IHS
rsx28 ??? D5305x CECH-43xx ? First RSX model with only 2 VRAM chips instead of 4

RSX pages organization at june 2021[edit source]

A template with the pinout has been added in all the pages for the RSX models made at 90nm, 65nm, and 40nm. There was some other minor problems in them because was made in different ways, one was a redirect, others was 99% empty, others not created yet, etc... Also in many of them there was a line with the compete list of RSX models made in the same nanometers (i think this is redundant because appears at the page footer). Anyway, now all the RSX pages (except 28nm) shares the same style and are made in the same way. This update was mostly a cleanup of what we have, keep in mind that is good to have a dedicated page for each incase someone wants to go picky with the details of that specific RSX model, to add photos of it, etc..., from this point we can discuss if there are better ways to reorganize them but this would be an upgrade, not neccesarilly to do it now--Sandungas (talk) 18:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

RSX series missing[edit source]

In the transistion from RSX 40nm to 28nm sony removed the prefix "CX" and reduced the suffix "xxxx" (4 optional characters in chronological order: GB -> AGB -> BGB -> CGB, etc...) to "x" (only 1 character, in chronological order: A, B, C, etc...) in the name
It seems the real reason why sony shorted the name this way is because in the 28nm DIE there is not enought room to etch the complete name, compare the different styles and font sizes in between 40nm with 28nm
So we can consider the D5305x used in the latest superslims is a CXD5305xxxx and is following the same numerical sequence than the previous RSX series, the list we have is:

  • CXD2971xxxx
  • CXD2982xxxx
  • CXD2991xxxx
  • CXD5300xxxx
  • CXD5301xxxx
  • CXD5302xxxx
  • CXD5305xxxx

But this sequence indicates there is a mistery, because there are 2 series missing (5301 -> 5302 -> 5303 -> 5304 -> 5305), either is like this:

  • CXD2971xxxx
  • CXD2982xxxx
  • CXD2991xxxx
  • CXD5300xxxx
  • CXD5301xxxx
  • CXD5302xxxx
  • CXD5303xxxx <--- undocumented / prototype (41x41 pad layout, 4*64MB VRAM)
  • CXD5304xxxx <--- undocumented / prototype (41x41 pad layout, 4*64MB VRAM)
  • CXD5305xxxx

Or like this

  • CXD2971xxxx
  • CXD2982xxxx
  • CXD2991xxxx
  • CXD5300xxxx
  • CXD5301xxxx
  • CXD5302xxxx
  • CXD5303xxxx <--- undocumented / prototype (34x34 pad layout, 2*128MB VRAM)
  • CXD5304xxxx <--- undocumented / prototype (34x34 pad layout, 2*128MB VRAM)
  • CXD5305xxxx
Retrieved from "http://www.psdevwiki.com/ps3/index.php?title=Talk:RSX&oldid=69905"