User talk:Zer0Tolerance: Difference between revisions
m (→3.72 DEX PUP problem (delete when solved): it's me) |
|||
Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
In case of deleting it definitivelly, consider in adding a mention to the problem for other wiki readers and editors to dont confuse thas file in the future | In case of deleting it definitivelly, consider in adding a mention to the problem for other wiki readers and editors to dont confuse thas file in the future | ||
Understood, thank You. | |||
Please Look at the pup hmac values of the "patch" and full pup file. They are same. But size of the "patch" is smaller. So this "patch" is just peace of the full pup file and not the real patch.pup I validated the full pup file using pupunpack app from ps3-tools: http://pastie.org/private/wcwu3s2zkadvwsgkmcvmw |
Revision as of 19:54, 18 December 2015
thanks :) Euss
User:Zer0Tolerance under observation because of posting strong SEXual content ;) - (User:Roxanne 17th December 2015 / 16:19 GMT+1)
Good joke, thanks. (User:Zer0Tolerance 17th December 2015 / 18:51 GMT+1)
About eid2 des iv
just a quick heads up. both eid2 des ivs (the zeroed one and the other one) are valid to use. in a way, both glevand (zero iv) and naehrwert (fixed iv) are correct. make sure you consult with naehrwert for more info.
@zecoxao Just use openssl des-cbc -d -in pblock.desenc -out pblock.dec -nosalt -K 6CCAB35405FA562C -iv 989A955EFDE7A748 -p -nopad and openssl des-cbc -d -in pblock.desenc -out pblock.dec -nosalt -K 6CCAB35405FA562C -iv 0 -p -nopad Only the second one vector is valid. Thank You.
@Zer0Tolerance
it's very rare to see naehrwert wrong. maybe the algorithm is handled differently in libeeid(polarssl) than in openssl? i'll talk to him when i have a chance ;) either way, thanks :)
@zecoxao
Im sorry, but iv must be zero. :(
@ZeroTolerance
I'm almost sure i was able to decrypt default.spp
please check all 3.15 key combinations possible.
Thanks :)
@zecoxao
Im checked it and could not decrypt metainfo into default spp, please provide me the decrypted metainfo as proof.
@ZeroTolerance
Unfortunately i don't have it anymore. but i'll try to decrypt it anyways :)
@zecoxao
Please recheck (retry) it if possible. Im sure that we needed another key(set) to decrypt default.spp for ceb.
@ZeroTolerance
yes, you're correct. just tested other combinations and none of them work.
About EID0_0_UNK1
@ZeroTolerance
Pretty sure it's z1 and z2 (2 hashes). looks like it's a metadata of sorts :)
@Zecoxao
Maybe, maybe not. hash algorithm is unknown yet.
@ZeroTolerance
Have you tried checking if it's a pub from another curve?
@Zecoxao
Pub is a point with X and Y. One Pub for one Priv. These "hashes" are not constants. So this is not a Pub. It can be two hmac-sha1 or something. IDK what is this.
EEPROM Syscon Probing
- some useful links:
http://dangerousprototypes.com/docs/Bus_Pirate_101_tutorial (bus pirate)
https://www.saleae.com/downloads (logic analyzer)
- Analyzer settings:
http://pastie.org/private/khwaczthr5j2td9jmdfihq
- Bus pirate settings:
http://pastie.org/private/mqycmj8ynxj5mdzttrgpca
- More info:
http://pastie.org/private/f7siriweadsnrpq6dilq
- Write Unlock command:
0xA3 0x00 0x00
- Write command:
0xA4 0xXX 0xXX (XX XX is block id)
- Read command:
0xA8 0xXX 0xXX (XX XX is block id)
- Check Status command:
0xA9 0x00 0x00 0x00
- Some proof
https://mega.co.nz/#!hssQHZhI!bNMS3MgWx21iUrfLGBSoB2bA3Mfe3DVL23y_SENzDUw
https://mega.co.nz/#!wl8wSCKK!ZZkgeKd8hdRCMRpA2oWrrV5lirjupF_4k9boJkBpBfM
you need https://www.saleae.com/downloads
- https://mega.co.nz/#!UltlyCTL!TAooXpYEWU3DmYlnHbY1FX4IX8WwdZlLeSOXh9mh3nM
- https://mega.co.nz/#!MwEXmQwI!iWQ6Z6-5GhnX0-9r1FBPw9cpOBfKJCna-0dT2GSUj9E
dump of eeprom with above data
3.72 DEX PUP problem (delete when solved)
I deleted the page 3.72-patch DEX but moved the content to Talk:3.72 DEX because i dont know about the file so i dont feel confident in deleting and in case of doubt i dont like to delete stuff, but feel free to delete it from there, also is needed to remove the link to the page from Template:Firmware--Sandungas (talk) 12:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
In case of deleting it definitivelly, consider in adding a mention to the problem for other wiki readers and editors to dont confuse thas file in the future
Understood, thank You. Please Look at the pup hmac values of the "patch" and full pup file. They are same. But size of the "patch" is smaller. So this "patch" is just peace of the full pup file and not the real patch.pup I validated the full pup file using pupunpack app from ps3-tools: http://pastie.org/private/wcwu3s2zkadvwsgkmcvmw