Talk:User Rights Requests and Suggestions
I made a small list of some user rights that needs to be reviewed, sorry if i forgot someone. Im considering the contribution scores as something orientative because there is people with low scores that published some unique info (it was one of the few persons in this whole able to do it, we was lucky they did it), i gave them the category of "epic edits" (whatever that means, lol is not related with wiki dedication but with the quality of his edits), there is other people (maybe not in this list) with high score because they was doing wiki manteainance/organization tasks additionally to research and/or decvelopement (btw we could make a new "R&D" user group). Im not sure if my understanding of the "VIP" group matches with yours, to me it looks like it could be used as a fallback for the users with either a higher contribution scrore or labeled as "epic editor" that became inactive (most from the list below)--Sandungas (talk) 06:23, 25 March 2023 (CET)
nick | score | epic | active | trusted | others --------------------------------------------------------------- Flatz | low | yes | no | yes | Glevand | high | yes | no | yes | Kakaroto | low | yes | no | yes | Kozarovv | high | - | yes | yes | M4j0r | high | yes | yes | yes | MikeM64 | high | - | yes | yes | Mrjaredbeta | high | - | yes | yes | Mysis | high | yes | no | yes | Naehrwert | medium | yes | no | yes | Nas plugi | medium | - | no | yes | PsiCoLeO | medium | - | no | yes | Zer0Tolerance | high | - | yes | yes | Graf chokolo | low | yes | no | yes | Mathieulh | high | - | no | yes | Nikitis | medium | - | no | yes | CrashSerious | medium | - | no | yes |