Talk:More System Information
Screenshot examples
- FW 3.41ofw CECH-25xx example
- FW 3.55 example
- FW CECHJ04 3.55 example
- FW 3.55 CECHG example
- FW 3.56 example
- FW 3.56 Demonhades example
- FW 3.65 example
- FW 4.00 example
- FW 4.00 example
- FW 4.00 example (SHOP)
- FW 4.00 example (DEX)
Syscon string format speculation
There are motherboards with 4.00 firmware with a string filled with zeroes after the "." (0000000000000000). This zeroes means that his SoftID includes all the needed patches (in other words... 4.00ofw contains no patches aplicables to this syscon)
There is a direct relationship between the numbers used in the names of the .pkg's and the info shown after the "." e.g: SYS_CON_FIRMWARE_01040402.pkg will be shown in screen as: 0E69.0001000400040002 (to convert the string just add a zeroed byte before every byte)
Based in the numbers used in the patches them can be ordered in a timeline from "older to newer": 0100****.pkg 0101****.pkg 0102****.pkg 0103****.pkg 0104****.pkg 0105****.pkg (there are only patches for 6 different syscons in 4.00 firmware, but probably there are more syscon generations used in newer motherboards that doesn't need patches yet)
The only patch that doesn't follow this rules is SYS_CON_FIRMWARE_S1_00010002083E0832.pkg whose numbers string doesn't need conversion, but it keeps the format 00010002******** (its unknown why this patch is speciall, and if it uses a different install method than the others)
Example tables (please help to fill it)
PS3 Fat | Bigger firmware installed | SoftID.SysconPatch@SC | Syscon generation | syscon patch installed | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CECH (A or B) | ???? | ???? | ???? | ???? | Needed example, generation 1 ? |
CECHCxx | 3.15 | 0C16.0001000100030002@SC | generation 2 | 01010302.pkg | Old patch because never updated over 3.40 |
CECHCxx | 3.55 | 0C16.0001000100030003@SC | generation 2 | 01010303.pkg | |
CECHCxx | 3.70 | 0C16.0001000100030003@SC | generation 2 | 01010303.pkg | |
CECHGxx | 3.55 | 0D52.0001000200030002@SC | generation 3 | 01020302.pkg | |
CECHHxx | 3.60 | 0DBF.0001000300030002@SC | generation 4 | 01030302.pkg | |
CECHHxx | 4.00 | 0DBF.0001000300030002@SC | generation 4 | 01030302.pkg | |
CECHJxx | 3.55 | 0E69.0001000400040002@SC | generation 5 | 01040402.pkg | |
CECHKxx | 3.55 | 0E69.0001000400040002@SC | generation 5 | 01040402.pkg | |
CECHLxx | 3.65 | 065D.0000000000000000@SC | generation 8? | No patches installed | generation needs comfirmation |
CECHPxx | 4.00 | 065D.0000000000000000@SC | generation 8? | No patches installed | generation needs comfirmation |
CECHQ | ???? | ???? | ???? | ???? | Needed example, generation 6 ? |
PS3 Slim | Bigger firmware installed | SoftID.SysconPatch@SC | Syscon generation | syscon patch installed | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CECH20xx | 4.00 | 0832.00010002083E0832@SC | generation 9? | 00010002083E0832.pkg | First model of slim with fat components |
CECH21xx | ???? | ???? | ???? | ???? | Needed example |
CECH25xx | 3.41 | 08C2.0000000000000000@SC | generation 10? | No patches installed | generation needs comfirmation |
CECH25xx | 4.00 | 08C2.0000000000000000@SC | generation 10? | No patches installed | generation needs comfirmation |
CECH30xx | 4.00 | 0918.0000000000000000@SC | generation 11? | No patches installed | generation needs comfirmation |
i think that this will explain everything: http://pastebin.com/k8KHGkzB and these are the generation of the SC http://pastebin.com/aJ3gxRKx (probably the first group is the correct one). deroad