Talk:RCOXML Objects
WidgetType
See the "paf" VSH Exports
It seems the WidgetType is an identifyer of what rcomage and this wiki page baptished as "objects". Of all them, or only a group
By looking at the internal RCO structure is obvious that the value used internally to identify every "object" is the first field of what we has been naming Template:RCO TOC entry common area, or in other words, the Template:RCO TOC entry types
So the question is... all "RCO TOC entry types" should be considered WidgetType ? (and consequentlly needed to be renamed in wiki pages)... or only a group of them are considered "widgets" ? and there is other group (no idea wich one by now, but RCOXML Animations could have a different name)
By looking at this list is posible to make a list of the exports that uses the keyword "WidgetType" and deduce the correspondency with the names we have been using in rcomage/wiki. Some of the "unnofficial" names we have been using matches exactlly, others partially, and there are a few "new" names hard to deduce to wich "object" corresponds, and probably are included the 2 infamous ObjUnknown0xB and ObjUnknown0x1B that are completlly unknown for rcomage and doesnt seems to be used in any of the official PSP and PS3 firmwares
VSH Exports string chunk | name in RCOmage | internal type value | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
ZN3paf8PhWidget10WidgetTypeEv | ? | ? | weird, a WidgetType named Widget ?... this sounds too generic |
ZN3paf7PhScene10WidgetTypeEv | ? | ? | also, this one sounds too generic too, maybe is the name of the "ObjectTree" (actually, all the trees ?) |
ZN3paf7PhPlane10WidgetTypeEv | Plane | 0x02 | |
0xE36C18F5 (returns PhPlaneDiv) | ? | ? | only appears in the VSH Exports page in wiki, not in the github list |
ZN3paf8PhButton10WidgetTypeEv | Button | 0x03 | |
ZN3paf6PhText10WidgetTypeEv | Text | 0x0D | |
ZN3paf8PhScroll10WidgetTypeEv | Scroll | 0x08 | |
ZN3paf11PhLabelPrim10WidgetTypeEv | ? | ? | candidate to be ObjUnknown0xB or ObjUnknown0x1B |
ZN3paf12PhLevelMeter10WidgetTypeEv | Meter | 0x1E | |
ZN3paf10PhProgress10WidgetTypeEv | Progress | 0x07 | |
ZN3paf10PhCheckBox10WidgetTypeEv | CheckBoxItem | 0x1D | |
ZN3paf7PhXmBar10WidgetTypeEv | XMenu ? | 0x04 ? | |
ZN3paf8PhXmList10WidgetTypeEv | ? | ? | |
ZN3paf8PhXmItem10WidgetTypeEv | ? | ? | |
ZN3paf10PhItemSpin10WidgetTypeEv | ItemSpin | 0x11 | |
ZN3paf9PhNumSpin10WidgetTypeEv | Spin ? | 0x0F ? | |
ZN3paf6PhList10WidgetTypeEv | ? | ? | |
ZN3paf10PhInfoList10WidgetTypeEv | IList | 0x17 | |
ZN3paf10PhMenuList10WidgetTypeEv | MList | 0x09 | |
ZN3paf14PhCheckBoxList10WidgetTypeEv | CheckBoxGroup | 0x1C | |
ZN3paf11PhLabelText10WidgetTypeEv | EditBox ? | 0x1F ? | |
ZN3paf7PhClock10WidgetTypeEv | Clock | 0x16 | |
ZN3paf8PhIPAddr10WidgetTypeEv | ? | ? | candidate to be ObjUnknown0xB or ObjUnknown0x1B. A widget only to display the IP address ? |
- Other unnofficial "object" names that are not in the table:
- General
- type=0x00 ObjectTree
- type=0x01 Page
- type=0x12 Group
- Lists and Items
- type=0x06 XList
- type=0x13 LList
- type=0x05 XMList
- type=0x0C XItem
- type=0x0A MItem
- type=0x14 LItem
- type=0x18 IItem
- Others
- type=0x19 Icon
- type=0x10 Action
- type=0x1A UButton
- type=0x0E ModelObject
- type=0x15 Edit
- Unknowns
- type=0x0B ObjUnknown0xB
- type=0x1B ObjUnknown0x1B
- General
ObjUnknown0xB
*Superbrainstorming based on smoke. This brainstorming seems to be wrong, because the object named "XMList" by rcomage seems to be an "item" so it cant have other xml "item" childrens
**what about this ?, matches prety fine with how are grouped. Main menu separated because is an special object created specifically for top XMB menu, and the others grouped in pairs for "list" and "item". Also matches how are ordered in rcomage. All this attributes appears consecutivelly in groups of two, at top... XMList and XList... then MList MItem... then ObjUnknown0xB and XItem... then LList and LItem... then IList and IItem. Note how XMList doesnt seems to have an XMItem
XMenu XMList ObjUnknown0xB <------ is XMItem ? XList XItem MList MItem LList LItem IList IItem
If this is true and ObjUnknown0xB is actually XMItem it seems is posible to deduce the attributes because the other "item" objects uses pretty similar attributes (usually 3 attributes, either images or texts), to verify it are needed some/lot of tests by copying the attributes from the other items and creating a 100% custom object for the experiment also a good understanding of all the other rcoxml code, so is hard to know, im not skilled/brave to build this frankenstein but i think the theory is good enought--Sandungas (talk) 08:16, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Objects using overrides in the "specific" attributes
The "standard" attributes contains 6 overrides and most objects uses the "standard" attributes, but additionally to this ones some of the objects (seems to) use more overrides in the "specific" attributes
- Some menu builders
- MList (3 ?)
- LList (2 ?)
- IList (1 ?)
- Text based objects
- Text (3 ?)
- EditBox (3 ?)
- Others
- CheckboxGroup (1 ?)
- Meter (1 ?)
Links, notes, etc...
- Elements and attributes to be used in RCOmageXML
- https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=es&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://ctfs.wiki.fc2.com/wiki/RCOmageXML&usg=ALkJrhjRxsEgJ7QEiFf9aBAfxp9-eXKIsQ
- http://electricvoice.blog40.fc2.com/blog-entry-668.html
- https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?act=url&depth=1&hl=es&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://electricvoice.blog40.fc2.com/blog-category-21.html&usg=ALkJrhg33PGW3RXbfzfYuN1OcV9P5AkM0w