User talk:Derf: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Wiki manteinance feedback) |
(tyop) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Wiki manteinance feedback == | == Wiki manteinance feedback == | ||
*Welcome to the | *Welcome to the kiwi, there are some things that requires your attention (like the long time broken [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:SyntaxHighlight syntaxhighlight+pygments] extension), but the first couple of things i would like to comment are the removal of the [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Contribution_Scores Contribution Scores] extension and the latest user right changes. I would like the contribution scores extension to be installed again because is the better way to show a proof of how much time and effort some of us dedicated to build the wiki as it is. Also, i think some of the latest user right changes was not needed because they broke the status quo, and/or could be considered offensive, some of them could fit in the new "VIP" user group but there are others not in the VIP group that deserves to be given at least the "trusted" status, or create a new group for them like "researchers", "pioneers", "oracles", "genius", "overlords" or whatever (it doesnt neds to be humoristic but i hope you get the point, his contributions are unique because they moved the scene forward)--[[User:Sandungas|Sandungas]] ([[User talk:Sandungas|talk]]) 01:14, 23 March 2023 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 01:16, 23 March 2023
Wiki manteinance feedback
- Welcome to the kiwi, there are some things that requires your attention (like the long time broken syntaxhighlight+pygments extension), but the first couple of things i would like to comment are the removal of the Contribution Scores extension and the latest user right changes. I would like the contribution scores extension to be installed again because is the better way to show a proof of how much time and effort some of us dedicated to build the wiki as it is. Also, i think some of the latest user right changes was not needed because they broke the status quo, and/or could be considered offensive, some of them could fit in the new "VIP" user group but there are others not in the VIP group that deserves to be given at least the "trusted" status, or create a new group for them like "researchers", "pioneers", "oracles", "genius", "overlords" or whatever (it doesnt neds to be humoristic but i hope you get the point, his contributions are unique because they moved the scene forward)--Sandungas (talk) 01:14, 23 March 2023 (CET)