Talk:Lv0: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
there is no ECDSA verification in LV0! still some ppl keep parroting it over and over. | there is no ECDSA verification in LV0! still some ppl keep parroting it over and over. | ||
== Component Manager == | |||
Can handle components by IDs, differs between firmwares. | |||
{| class="wikitable FCK__ShowTableBorders" | |||
|- | |||
! Component ID !! Name | |||
|- | |||
| 0x00 || metldr | |||
|- | |||
| 0x01 || lv1ldr | |||
|- | |||
| 0x02 || lv2ldr | |||
|- | |||
| 0x03 || appldr | |||
|- | |||
| 0x04 || isoldr | |||
|- | |||
| 0x05 || rvkldr | |||
|- | |||
| 0x06 || lv1.self | |||
|- | |||
| 0x07 || parm.txt | |||
|- | |||
| 0x08 || sysctl.txt | |||
|- | |||
| 0x09 || sdk_version | |||
|- | |||
| 0x0A || ? <!-- individual / asecure_loader / ros / os / image.bin / ... --> | |||
|- | |||
| 0x0B || ? <!-- individual / asecure_loader / ros / os / image.bin / ... --> | |||
|- | |||
| 0x0C || eid0 | |||
|- | |||
| 0x0D || ? | |||
|- | |||
| 0x0E || metldr.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 0x0F || lv1ldr.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 0x10 || lv2ldr.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 0x11 || appldr.2 | |||
|- | |||
| 0x12 || isoldr.2 | |||
|} |
Latest revision as of 14:25, 13 December 2017
stupid newssites are morons : they list newer firmwares lv0 decrypted as 'news', because the static (never changed!) key can be used to decrypt it. /rant
+1. The minds of media today.. D:
there is no ECDSA verification in LV0! still some ppl keep parroting it over and over.
Component Manager[edit source]
Can handle components by IDs, differs between firmwares.
Component ID | Name |
---|---|
0x00 | metldr |
0x01 | lv1ldr |
0x02 | lv2ldr |
0x03 | appldr |
0x04 | isoldr |
0x05 | rvkldr |
0x06 | lv1.self |
0x07 | parm.txt |
0x08 | sysctl.txt |
0x09 | sdk_version |
0x0A | ? |
0x0B | ? |
0x0C | eid0 |
0x0D | ? |
0x0E | metldr.2 |
0x0F | lv1ldr.2 |
0x10 | lv2ldr.2 |
0x11 | appldr.2 |
0x12 | isoldr.2 |