User talk:Ada lovelace: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ada lovelace (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
CelesteBlue (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Dumping PS3 Model Data: | Dumping PS3 Model Data: | ||
- PS3 System | - PS3 System Product Code: 0x85 (Retail - Europe) | ||
- PS3 Motherboard Revision: 0x0B (JTP-001 Motherboard, Revision 1) | - PS3 Motherboard Revision: 0x0B (JTP-001 Motherboard, Revision 1) | ||
- PS3 BD-Laser Revision: 0x04 (KES-400, SACD supported) | - PS3 BD-Laser Revision: 0x04 (KES-400, SACD supported) | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Ah, right, that tool has it all wrong indeed. Based on the [[ | Ah, right, that tool has it all wrong indeed. Based on the [[Product Code]] 0x85 / [[IDPS]] 0x0B it should already know it isnt SA-CD capable and that it is a Slim with modern BD. [[User:Euss|Euss]] |
Latest revision as of 23:00, 3 September 2020
I have reverted your edit on http://www.ps3devwiki.com/index.php?title=CECH-25xx, 3 reasons:
- The way it was added, made it not visible in template
- Lasers are sub of Bluray Drive
- Information was wrong (see above link, the 2500 series have KES-460A/KES-470A laser (and most propably have BD460/BD470 drive with BMD-051 or newer daughterboard), incapable of driving oldest (up to CECHG / SEM-001) single lens lasers.
greets, Euss
Thanks you for the edit and sorry for my mistake.
And again thanks you for this wiki place.
Informations were from a ps3 slim European (3.50 min or so app from what i remenber), generated by data.pkg (tools who isn t accurate also for SACD) but file were overwritten from .txt fat ps3:
Dumping PS3 Model Data:
- PS3 System Product Code: 0x85 (Retail - Europe) - PS3 Motherboard Revision: 0x0B (JTP-001 Motherboard, Revision 1) - PS3 BD-Laser Revision: 0x04 (KES-400, SACD supported)
Probable Model: CECH-2504A
Raw Model Data:
Byte 0: 0x00 Byte 1: 0x01 Byte 2: 0x00 Byte 3: 0x85 Byte 4: 0x00 Byte 5: 0x0B Byte 6: 0x00 Byte 7: 0x04 Byte 7: 0x04
Ah, right, that tool has it all wrong indeed. Based on the Product Code 0x85 / IDPS 0x0B it should already know it isnt SA-CD capable and that it is a Slim with modern BD. Euss