Revision as of 05:51, 26 November 2016

WidgetType

It seems the WidgetType is an identifyer of what rcomage and this wiki page baptished as "objects". Of all them, or only a group

By looking at the internal RCO structure is obvious that the value used internally to identify every "object" is the first field of what we has been naming Template:RCO TOC entry common area, or in other words, the Template:RCO TOC entry types

So the question is... all "RCO TOC entry types" should be considered WidgetType ? (and consequentlly needed to be renamed in wiki pages)... or only a group of them are considered "widgets" ? and there is other group (no idea wich one by now, but [RCOXML Animations] could have a different name)

By looking at this list is posible to make a list of the exports that uses the keyword "WidgetType" and deduce the correspondency with the names we have been using in rcomage/wiki. Most of the "unnofficial" names we have been using matches exactlly, others partially, and there are a few "new" names hard to deduce to wich "object" corresponds, and probably are included the 2 infamous ObjUnknown0xB and ObjUnknown0x1B that are completlly unknown for rcomage and doesnt seems to be used in any of the official PSP and PS3 firmwares

VSH Exports string chunk	name in RCOmage	internal type value	Notes
ZN3paf8PhWidget10WidgetTypeEv	?	?	weird, a WidgetType named Widget ?... this sounds too generic
ZN3paf7PhScene10WidgetTypeEv	?	?	also, this one sounds too generic too, maybe is the name of the "ObjectTree" (actually, all the trees ?)
ZN3paf7PhPlane10WidgetTypeEv	Plane	0x02
ZN3paf8PhButton10WidgetTypeEv	Button	0x03
ZN3paf6PhText10WidgetTypeEv	Text	0x0D
ZN3paf8PhScroll10WidgetTypeEv	Scroll	0x08
ZN3paf11PhLabelPrim10WidgetTypeEv	?	?	candidate to be ObjUnknown0xB or ObjUnknown0x1B
ZN3paf12PhLevelMeter10WidgetTypeEv	Meter	0x1E
ZN3paf10PhProgress10WidgetTypeEv	Progress	0x07
ZN3paf10PhCheckBox10WidgetTypeEv	CheckBoxItem	0X1D
ZN3paf7PhXmBar10WidgetTypeEv	?	?
ZN3paf8PhXmList10WidgetTypeEv	?	?
ZN3paf8PhXmItem10WidgetTypeEv	?	?
ZN3paf10PhItemSpin10WidgetTypeEv	ItemSpin	0x11
ZN3paf9PhNumSpin10WidgetTypeEv	Spin ?	0x0F ?
ZN3paf6PhList10WidgetTypeEv	?	?
ZN3paf10PhInfoList10WidgetTypeEv	IList	0x17
ZN3paf10PhMenuList10WidgetTypeEv	MList	0x09
ZN3paf14PhCheckBoxList10WidgetTypeEv	CheckBoxGroup	0x1C
ZN3paf11PhLabelText10WidgetTypeEv	EditBox ?	0x1F ?
ZN3paf7PhClock10WidgetTypeEv	Clock	0x16
ZN3paf8PhIPAddr10WidgetTypeEv	?	?	candidate to be ObjUnknown0xB or ObjUnknown0x1B. A widget only to dislay the IP address ?

Other unnofficial "object" names that are not in the table:
- type=0x00 ObjectTree
- type=0x01 Page
- type=0x12 Group
- type=0x04 XMenu
- type=0x06 XList
- type=0x13 LList
- type=0x05 XMList
- type=0x0C XItem
- type=0x0A MItem
- type=0x14 LItem
- type=0x18 IItem
- type=0x19 Icon
- type=0x10 Action
- type=0x1A UButton
- type=0x0E ModelObject
- type=0x15 Edit
- type=0x0B ObjUnknown0xB
- type=0x1B ObjUnknown0xB

ObjUnknown0xB

*Superbrainstorming based on smoke. This brainstorming seems to be wrong, because the object named "XMList" by rcomage seems to be an "item" so it cant have other xml "item" childrens **what about this ?, matches prety fine with how are grouped. Main menu separated because is an special object created specifically for top XMB menu, and the others grouped in pairs for "list" and "item". Also matches how are ordered in rcomage. All this attributes appears consecutivelly in groups of two, at top... XMList and XList... then MList MItem... then ObjUnknown0xB and XItem... then LList and LItem... then IList and IItem. Note how XMList doesnt seems to have an XMItem

~~XMenu XMList ObjUnknown0xB <------ is XMItem ? XList XItem MList MItem LList LItem IList IItem~~

If this is true and ObjUnknown0xB is actually XMItem it seems is posible to deduce the attributes because the other "item" objects uses pretty similar attributes (usually 3 attributes, either images or texts), to verify it are needed some/lot of tests by copying the attributes from the other items and creating a 100% custom object for the experiment also a good understanding of all the other rcoxml code, so is hard to know, im not skilled/brave to build this frankenstein but i think the theory is good enought--Sandungas (talk) 08:16, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Objects using overrides in the "specific" attributes

The "standard" attributes contains 6 overrides and most objects uses the "standard" attributes, but additionally to this ones some of the objects (seems to) use more overrides in the "specific" attributes

Some menu builders
- MList (3 ?)
- LList (2 ?)
- IList (1 ?)

Text based objects
- Text (3 ?)
- EditBox (3 ?)

Others
- CheckboxGroup (1 ?)
- Meter (1 ?)

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 | ZN3paf8Ph'''IPAddr'''10WidgetTypeEv || ? || ? || candidate to be '''ObjUnknown0xB''' or '''ObjUnknown0x1B'''. <abbr title="it could be the frame used to display the red warning of ''service mode''">A widget only to dislay the IP address ?</abbr>
 |}
+*Other unnofficial "object" names that are not in the table:
+**type=0x00 '''ObjectTree'''
+**type=0x01 '''Page'''
+**type=0x12 '''Group'''
+**type=0x04 '''XMenu'''
+**type=0x06 '''XList'''
+**type=0x13 '''LList'''
+**type=0x05 '''XMList'''
+**type=0x0C '''XItem'''
+**type=0x0A '''MItem'''
+**type=0x14 '''LItem'''
+**type=0x18 '''IItem'''
+**type=0x19 '''Icon'''
+**type=0x10 '''Action'''
+**type=0x1A '''UButton'''
+**type=0x0E '''ModelObject'''
+**type=0x15 '''Edit'''
+**type=0x0B '''ObjUnknown0xB'''
+**type=0x1B '''ObjUnknown0xB'''
 =ObjUnknown0xB=

Talk:RCOXML Objects: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:51, 26 November 2016

Contents

WidgetType

ObjUnknown0xB

Objects using overrides in the "specific" attributes

Links, notes, etc...

Suggestions

Navigation menu

Talk:RCOXML Objects: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:51, 26 November 2016

WidgetType

ObjUnknown0xB

Objects using overrides in the "specific" attributes

Links, notes, etc...

Suggestions

Navigation menu

Search