Talk:Virtual TRM Manager: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 08:22, 19 July 2014
Root Info[edit source]
Obtainable with packet_id 0x2014 through syscall 862. Structure is as follows:
| Offset | Size | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0x00 | 0x04 | unk1 | |
| 0x04 | 0x08 | padding | |
| 0x0C | 0x04 | unk2 | |
| 0x10 | 0x04 | padding | |
| 0x14 | 0x04 | hash_id?(goes 01 first) | 90 01 |
| 0x18 | 0x04 | padding | |
| 0x1C | 0x04 | hash_id?(goes 00 last) | 90 00 |
| 0x20 | 0x08 | padding | |
| 0x28 | 0x08 | auth_id_1 | 10 70 00 00 02 00 00 01 |
| 0x30 | 0x08 | auth_id_2 | 10 70 00 03 FF 00 00 01 |
| 0x38 | 0x14 | srh <-root hash | |
| 0x4C | 0x04 | padding | |
| 0x50 | 0x14 | srk <-root hsec | |
| 0x64 | 0x1C | padding |
Notes about root info[edit source]
- Name of packet id is "Backup SRK SRH". However, SRH shows first and SRK shows last. That seems to be denoted by the hash_ids (i decided to call them that way). auth_id_1 seems to be correlated with srk (since srk is used on VTRM, and the 0FACE0FF DEADFACE area is located after cVTRM) while auth_id_2 seems to be correlated with srh.
- As for the unknowns, they seem to be not involved at all with the hashes, although they might have something to do with the clock drift.