Talk:RAM: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Backdoor? == | == Backdoor? == | ||
According to a tweet by (already deleted, [https://twitter.com/RichDevX/status/504389462496137217 source]), there is a backdoor in XDR Ram that allows the attacker to write to any place in the memory. 16:40, 27 August 2014 [[User:Zecoxao]] | |||
According to a tweet by | : without actual tweet hard to discuss... It is in the nature of /XDR/ RAM to be Random Accessable Memory in the first place ;) As long as you stick to that one module at a time. There is no HV/W^X etc on that hardware level (which takes place in the CPU / OS instead) [[User:Euss|Euss]] ([[User talk:Euss|talk]]) 12:13, 27 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:13, 27 August 2014
source: http://www.edepot.com/playstation3.html#PS3_Motherboard
Direct Rambus Technology
A PDF from Stanford explains this very well.
K4Y50164UE-JCB3 Datasheet
A very helpful PDF explaining everything there is to know about this chip.
http://www.keepandshare.com/doc/4521123/k4y50044ue-pdf-3-5-meg?da=y
Backdoor?
According to a tweet by (already deleted, source), there is a backdoor in XDR Ram that allows the attacker to write to any place in the memory. 16:40, 27 August 2014 User:Zecoxao
- without actual tweet hard to discuss... It is in the nature of /XDR/ RAM to be Random Accessable Memory in the first place ;) As long as you stick to that one module at a time. There is no HV/W^X etc on that hardware level (which takes place in the CPU / OS instead) Euss (talk) 12:13, 27 August 2014 (EDT)