User talk:Zer0Tolerance: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (@ zecoxao) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
openssl des-cbc -d -in pblock.desenc -out pblock.dec -nosalt -K 6CCAB35405FA562C -iv 0 -p -nopad | openssl des-cbc -d -in pblock.desenc -out pblock.dec -nosalt -K 6CCAB35405FA562C -iv 0 -p -nopad | ||
Only the second one vector is valid. Thank You. | Only the second one vector is valid. Thank You. | ||
@Zer0Tolerance | |||
it's very rare to see naehrwert wrong. maybe the algorithm is handled differently in libeeid(polarssl) than in openssl? | |||
i'll talk to him when i have a chance ;) | |||
either way, thanks :) |
Revision as of 03:17, 5 September 2013
thanks :) Euss
About eid2 des iv
just a quick heads up. both eid2 des ivs (the zeroed one and the other one) are valid to use. in a way, both glevand (zero iv) and naehrwert (fixed iv) are correct. make sure you consult with naehrwert for more info.
@zecoxao Just use openssl des-cbc -d -in pblock.desenc -out pblock.dec -nosalt -K 6CCAB35405FA562C -iv 989A955EFDE7A748 -p -nopad and openssl des-cbc -d -in pblock.desenc -out pblock.dec -nosalt -K 6CCAB35405FA562C -iv 0 -p -nopad Only the second one vector is valid. Thank You.
@Zer0Tolerance
it's very rare to see naehrwert wrong. maybe the algorithm is handled differently in libeeid(polarssl) than in openssl? i'll talk to him when i have a chance ;) either way, thanks :)