Editing User talk:Zer0Tolerance

thanks :) [[User:Euss|Euss]]

[[User:Zer0Tolerance]] under observation because of posting strong [http://www.psdevwiki.com/ps3/index.php?limit=500&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Zer0Tolerance&namespace=0&topOnly=1&year=2015&month=12 SEX]ual content ;) - ([[User:Roxanne]] 17th December 2015 / 16:19 GMT+1)

Good joke, thanks. ([[User:Zer0Tolerance]] 17th December 2015 / 18:51 GMT+1)

=About eid2 des iv=

just a quick heads up. both eid2 des ivs (the zeroed one and the other one) are valid to use. in a way, both glevand (zero iv) and naehrwert (fixed iv) are correct. make sure you consult with [[User:naehrwert|naehrwert]] for more info.

[[User:zecoxao|zecoxao]]

@zecoxao
Just use 
openssl des-cbc -d -in pblock.desenc -out pblock.dec -nosalt -K 6CCAB35405FA562C -iv 989A955EFDE7A748 -p -nopad
and
openssl des-cbc -d -in pblock.desenc -out pblock.dec -nosalt -K 6CCAB35405FA562C -iv 0 -p -nopad
Only the second one vector is valid. Thank You.

@Zer0Tolerance 

it's very rare to see naehrwert wrong. maybe the algorithm is handled differently in libeeid(polarssl) than in openssl?
i'll talk to him when i have a chance ;)
either way, thanks :)

@zecoxao

Im sorry, but iv must be zero. :(

@ZeroTolerance

I'm almost sure i was able to decrypt default.spp

please check all 3.15 key combinations possible.

Thanks :)

@zecoxao

Im checked it and could not decrypt metainfo into default spp, please provide me the decrypted metainfo as proof.

@ZeroTolerance

Unfortunately i don't have it anymore. but i'll try to decrypt it anyways :)

@zecoxao

Please recheck (retry) it if possible. Im sure that we needed another key(set) to decrypt default.spp for ceb.

@ZeroTolerance

yes, you're correct. just tested other combinations and none of them work.

= About EID0_0_UNK1 =

@ZeroTolerance

Pretty sure it's z1 and z2 (2 hashes).
looks like it's a metadata of sorts :)

@Zecoxao

Maybe, maybe not. hash algorithm is unknown yet.

@ZeroTolerance

Have you tried checking if it's a pub from another curve?

@Zecoxao

Pub is a point with X and Y. One Pub for one Priv. These "hashes" are not constants. So this is not a Pub.
It can be two hmac-sha1 or something. IDK what is this.

= EEPROM Syscon Probing =

* some useful links:

http://dangerousprototypes.com/docs/Bus_Pirate_101_tutorial (bus pirate) <br>
https://www.saleae.com/downloads (logic analyzer)

* Analyzer settings:

http://pastie.org/private/khwaczthr5j2td9jmdfihq

* Bus pirate settings:

http://pastie.org/private/mqycmj8ynxj5mdzttrgpca

* More info:

http://pastie.org/private/f7siriweadsnrpq6dilq

* Write Unlock command:

0xA3 0x00 0x00

* Write command:

0xA4 0xXX 0xXX (XX XX is block id)

* Read command: 

0xA8 0xXX 0xXX (XX XX is block id)

* Check Status command:

0xA9 0x00 0x00 0x00

* Some proof

https://mega.co.nz/#!hssQHZhI!bNMS3MgWx21iUrfLGBSoB2bA3Mfe3DVL23y_SENzDUw<br>
https://mega.co.nz/#!wl8wSCKK!ZZkgeKd8hdRCMRpA2oWrrV5lirjupF_4k9boJkBpBfM

you need https://www.saleae.com/downloads

* https://mega.co.nz/#!UltlyCTL!TAooXpYEWU3DmYlnHbY1FX4IX8WwdZlLeSOXh9mh3nM
* https://mega.co.nz/#!MwEXmQwI!iWQ6Z6-5GhnX0-9r1FBPw9cpOBfKJCna-0dT2GSUj9E

dump of eeprom with above data

= Thank you for puppies =

http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/nightline/wp-content/uploads/puppies.jpeg

=Help with VSH exports related with RCO=
Not sure if you took a look at this table [[Talk:RCOXML_Objects#WidgetType]], i made it thanks to your research with [[VSH_Exports#paf]], but im having a problem, by looking at RCO stuff i think there are a couple of vsh exports missing in your list, not sure how you are getting them (reversing the hash from nids i guess), i know the codenames of some rco stuff so i can imagine the vsh export names that should have, please take a look if this ones exists
*paf::PhPlaneDiv::WidgetType(void)
*paf::PhPrim::WidgetType(void)

I am using a FNID_Validator, this tool just calculates a hash from function name, i guessing function name and verifying hash. I also using fnid_bruteforcer to bruteforce a few chars at the tail of function name.<BR>
You found correct function name, just mangled it and validated:<BR>
_ZN3paf10PhPlaneDiv10WidgetTypeEv   FNID is 0xE36C18F5<BR>
I also tryed to find second one, but no luck.<BR>
Thanks a lot.

Nice, and this one ? (i think im missing one or two more, is mostly a blind shoot trying to imagine the names)
*paf::PhLabelButton::WidgetType(void)

paf::PhLabelButton::WidgetType(void) not found on vsh exports :(
----
Ok, one last question, im wondering if there is some typo here, at bottom of [[VSH_Exports#paf]] table... this is normal ? (2 different NIDs returning the same object name)
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! Export NID !! Notes !! Usage
|-
| 0xCA9160F6 || returns "PhNumSpin" || const char* paf_CA9160F6()
|-
| 0x59A11C82 || returns "PhNumSpin" || const char* paf_59A11C82()
|-
|}

Why not? Asm code is same for both functions, so there are 2 same functions with different names.

Ok, it was another blind shoot, just because at bottom of paf table you have a group of NIDs that returns 24 object names, and in my table i have only 23, the difference of 1 is because the "PhNumSpin" is repeated in the paf table... i was wondering if it could be a typo and it was "hiding" a new unknown object name (to ask you later to search for '''paf::PhUnknown::WidgetType(void)'''), but i guess that was too much speculation, heheh, if at some point i imagine better names for the ones im missing (not sure if im missing some of how much though) i will tell, but by now thats all, thx