Editing User talk:Zer0Tolerance

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 119: Line 119:
dump of eeprom with above data
dump of eeprom with above data


= Thank you for puppies =
=3.72 DEX PUP problem (delete when solved)=
I deleted the page [[3.72-patch DEX]] but moved the content to [[Talk:3.72 DEX]] because i dont know about the file so i dont feel confident in deleting and in case of doubt i dont like to delete stuff, but feel free to delete it from there, also is needed to remove the link to the page from [[Template:Firmware]]--[[User:Sandungas|Sandungas]] ([[User talk:Sandungas|talk]]) 12:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/nightline/wp-content/uploads/puppies.jpeg
In case of deleting it definitivelly, consider in adding a mention to the problem for other wiki readers and editors to dont confuse thas file in the future


= Mike's WriteUp =
Understood, thank You.  
 
Please Look at the pup hmac values of the "patch" and full pup file. They are same. But size of the "patch" is smaller. So this "patch" is just peace of the full pup file and not the real patch.pup I validated the full pup file using pupunpack app from ps3-tools: http://pastie.org/private/wcwu3s2zkadvwsgkmcvmw
when you have time come talk with me on discord about https://github.com/MikeM64/Exploit-Writeups/blob/main/PS3/lv0ldr-spi-mitm/lv0ldr-spi-mitm.md
 
thanks, zecoxao
 
Also, you're needed on telegram. thanks
 
=Help with VSH exports related with RCO=
Not sure if you took a look at this table [[Talk:RCOXML_Objects#WidgetType]], i made it thanks to your research with [[VSH_Exports#paf]], but im having a problem, by looking at RCO stuff i think there are a couple of vsh exports missing in your list, not sure how you are getting them (reversing the hash from nids i guess), i know the codenames of some rco stuff so i can imagine the vsh export names that should have, please take a look if this ones exists
*paf::PhPlaneDiv::WidgetType(void)
*paf::PhPrim::WidgetType(void)
 
I am using a FNID_Validator, this tool just calculates a hash from function name, i guessing function name and verifying hash. I also using fnid_bruteforcer to bruteforce a few chars at the tail of function name.<BR>
You found correct function name, just mangled it and validated:<BR>
_ZN3paf10PhPlaneDiv10WidgetTypeEv  FNID is 0xE36C18F5<BR>
I also tryed to find second one, but no luck.<BR>
Thanks a lot.
 
Nice, and this one ? (i think im missing one or two more, is mostly a blind shoot trying to imagine the names)
*paf::PhLabelButton::WidgetType(void)
 
paf::PhLabelButton::WidgetType(void) not found on vsh exports :(
----
Ok, one last question, im wondering if there is some typo here, at bottom of [[VSH_Exports#paf]] table... this is normal ? (2 different NIDs returning the same object name)
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! Export NID !! Notes !! Usage
|-
| 0xCA9160F6 || returns "PhNumSpin" || const char* paf_CA9160F6()
|-
| 0x59A11C82 || returns "PhNumSpin" || const char* paf_59A11C82()
|-
|}
 
Why not? Asm code is same for both functions, so there are 2 same functions with different names.
 
Ok, it was another blind shoot, just because at bottom of paf table you have a group of NIDs that returns 24 object names, and in my table i have only 23, the difference of 1 is because the "PhNumSpin" is repeated in the paf table... i was wondering if it could be a typo and it was "hiding" a new unknown object name (to ask you later to search for '''paf::PhUnknown::WidgetType(void)'''), but i guess that was too much speculation, heheh, if at some point i imagine better names for the ones im missing (not sure if im missing some of how much though) i will tell, but by now thats all, thx
 
There is a table of "widgets"<BR>
1) paf::PhWidget::WidgetType(void)<BR>
2) "PhCamera" there is a function without export/import, so I can not validate func name by hash<BR>
3) paf::PhScene::WidgetType(void)<BR>
4) paf::PhPlane::WidgetType(void)<BR>
5) paf::PhPlaneDiv::WidgetType(void)<BR>
6) paf::PhButton::WidgetType(void)<BR>
7) "PhOskButton" simillar to case 2 - function without export/import<BR>
8) paf::PhText::WidgetType(void)<BR>
9) paf::PhScroll::WidgetType(void)<BR>
10) paf::PhLabelPrim::WidgetType(void)<BR>
11) paf::PhLevelMeter::WidgetType(void)<BR>
12) paf::PhProgress::WidgetType(void)<BR>
13) paf::PhCheckBox::WidgetType(void)<BR>
14) paf::PhXmBar::WidgetType(void)<BR>
15) paf::PhXmList::WidgetType(void)<BR>
16) paf::PhXmItem::WidgetType(void)<BR>
17) "PhSpin" simillar to case 2 - function without export/import<BR>
18) paf::PhItemSpin::WidgetType(void)<BR>
19) paf::PhNumSpin::WidgetType(void)<BR>
20) paf::PhList::WidgetType(void)<BR>
21) paf::PhInfoList::WidgetType(void)<BR>
22) paf::PhMenuList::WidgetType(void)<BR>
23) paf::PhCheckBoxList::WidgetType(void)<BR>
24) paf::PhLabelText::WidgetType(void)<BR>
25) "PhLabelPrimDiv" simillar to case 2 - function without export/import<BR>
26) paf::PhClock::WidgetType(void)<BR>
27) paf::PhIPAddr::WidgetType(void)
 
Nice, with 4 more the numbers starts matching, by RCO format specificatios there are up to 0x1F [[Template:RCO_TOC_entry_types]], i did not expect for all them to have exports so is nice you got this new 4 names (rcomage and me in wikipages has been named them "objects" but im starting having doubts about that naming convention). I noticed a group that doesnt have exports is all the objects named "items" by rcomage. By looking at that template it can be seen the chronologicall order where was implemented by sony programmers, the first ones are the constructors for the main "xrossmediabar", and every time where appears a "list" it comes an "item" inmediatly after. Other than this "items" there could be more without exports but are not going to be much (maybe 1 or 2)
 
Well, instead of brainstorming here im going to update that table at [[Talk:RCOXML_Objects#WidgetType]]. initially was just some dirty notes to help me in the research but is becoming something important and i guess eventually could be moved from talk to frontpage
 
paf::PhXmList::BlinkStart(float)
 
Not found :(
 
*And this ones ?... seems to be used as counters and indicates how many "items" childrens there are under the "lists" (this ones are to "Set", i guess there could be others more to "Get"):
**paf::PhXmBar::SetItemNum(int)
**paf::PhMenuList::SetItemNum(int)
**paf::PhCheckBoxList::SetItemNum(int)
**paf::PhLabelPrim::SetItemNum(int)
 
Not found
 
Thanks, good to know anyway, now i "just" need to imagine why some "list" has vsh exports to "SetItemNum" but others doesnt. I guess there must be a good reason for it but right now i cant imagine why, i was not expecting to unlock the triple "not found" combo, but it seems im in a strike :'(
Please note that all contributions to PS3 Developer wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2 (see PS3 Developer wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following hCaptcha:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)
Retrieved from "http://www.psdevwiki.com/ps3/User_talk:Zer0Tolerance"