Editing User talk:Euss

http://pastie.org/9784204

Something looks broken in some templates (e.g. the ones that are using this image: [[File:Imbox_content.png]], and some others that are using the other icons that appears at the bottom of Category:Templates

<-- those are imports from wikipedia or others.

**[[Template:Y]] -> used on [[QA_Flagging#Debug_Settings_.28CEX.2FDEX.29]]

**[[Template:Yes:Failed]] -> future use reserved @ [[TemplateTest#Template_Test]]

**[[TemplateTest]] -> Things handy as reference from [[Wiki_Sandbox_Test]] need to be moved there

**[[Template:N]] -> used on [[QA_Flagging#Debug_Settings_.28CEX.2FDEX.29]]

*And others that has been converted to templates but can be moved to a "normal" page like:

**[[Comgenie%27s_Awesome_File_Manager]]

**[[Free_Heroes_2]]

**[[MultiMan]]

**[[Scogger_HD]]

**[[SGT_Puzzles]]

Here are the Mountpoints that are listed on the wiki [[Files on the PS3]].. maybe a new page with them can be really useful! <br />

About the naming of Shop FW. Terms like "SEX" are just pseudonyms, shop firmwares are technically CEX firmwares, they only work on ps3s with a retail (CEX) Product Codes, and the term "shop" is only mentioned in the index.dat, version.txt, vsh.self(update URL). The term "SEX" is never mentioned in Shop FWs. In the UPL.xml, shop FW uses the same '''<Product>''' value as retail FW (CEX-ww). I personally think it is incorrect to exclusively refer to retail FW as CEX FW, and then to say shop FW is SEX firmware as if it is SEX is another kind of Product Code. It's more correct to say '''Retail FW'''and '''Shop FW''' and class them both under CEX Firmware, or Firmwares made for CEX consoles. And as a side note, because they are both made for CEX PS3s, it is relatively easy to install either retail or shop fw on a CEX PS3 regardless of which one is already installed. Just generally, naming FWs after Product Codes is incorrect, it just so happens that for all PS3 types (except CEX) there is only one FW type which can be used with it.--[[User:Ps3hen|Ps3hen]] 09:18, 22 November 2012 (MSK)

: ''The SEX shortcode is just a made up name<!--// old insider joke, sexshop //-->. It saves you from writing "CEX/Retail patched to Shop/Kiosk/Demonstration by adding promo_flags in root of PUP or a firmware officially downloaded from [http://fshop01.ps3.update.playstation.net/update/ps3/list/shop/ps3-updatelist.txt Shop updater server] which updates independant from normal CEX/Retail server" - see also [[Product Code]]'' [[User:Euss|Euss]]

::I see, well perhaps having a note next to SEX Firmware in the software settings table, just so people understand it's a CEX firmware too. Yes I have seen the Product Code page recently.--[[User:Ps3hen|Ps3hen]] 10:18, 22 November 2012 (MSK)

:Havent looked at authIDs, but I know both ROS where filled with [[0.85.009]] which is a DEX preretail FW - thus I assumed it was the DEH/cookie13 (it is a cookie13 for sure). But looking at the Product Code 0x83 made me doubt and it seemed a CEX preretail. Perhaps it is a CEX QA flagged, capable of runnning DEX - like that CBEH.<br />[[User:Euss|Euss]]

:It could be a special QA Token Flag that allows installing of FW for other Product Codes or the FW just doesn't check the Product Code. (Or: Maybe it's a preretail CEX FW?; The CBEH (CECH Prototypes) that I know do have CEX Product Code)<br />[[User:Strike_Venom|Strike Venom]]

:OK, it's the "normal" 085.009 ROM -> Either it's not checking the Product Code (If you look at the [[Talk:Playstation_Update_Package_(PUP)#Ancient_preproduction_.2F_prototype|ebootrom structure]], there's no way for the installer to determine for which Product Code this Update is) or a special QA-Flag is required.<br/>Update: I asked someone who owns a DEH-H1001-D and he says that the PS3 accepts only DEX Updates (even 4.30+!), so if this is a valid dump from a DEH-H1001-D, there must be something else that allows installing DEX FW on CEX.<br />[[User:Strike Venom|Strike Venom]]

which is that [[COOKIE-13]] board with {{CEX}} tid added in [[Talk:Flash:asecure_loader&diff=next&oldid=18285]] [[User:Euss|Euss]]

:OK, it's the "normal" 085.009 ROM -> Either it's not checking the Product Code (If you look at the [[Talk:Playstation_Update_Package_(PUP)#Ancient_preproduction_.2F_prototype|ebootrom structure]], there's no way for the installer to determine for which Product Code this Update is) or a special QA-Flag is required.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hey man, I just wanted to suggest changing the dead links on the front page under Reverse Engineering → Emulation to their respective PSX/PS2/PSP _emu page section. Alternatively, it would garner more attention to have the [[PS2 Classics Emulator Compatibility List]] and the (recently created) [[PSP Emulator Compatibility List]] linked on the front page. I'm sure more people would contribute and they would be adapted as the "official" ones in the community. Just some thoughts, cheers! ~[[User:Derf Jagged|Derf Jagged]]

* Done, but it could take 24 to 48 hours that it will be displayed correctly on the front page (and all other pages who shares this template) - [[User:Roxanne|Roxanne]] ([[User talk:Roxanne|talk]]) - 05^th June 2016 - 23:47 GMT+1

* Which page exactly? According to the logs, the [[Harddrive]] page should be already unlocked since 5^th February 2014, 12:17h - [[User:Roxanne|Roxanne]] ([[User talk:Roxanne|talk]]) - 01^st November 2016 - 18:19 GMT+1

{{Template:User_talk:Euss:menu}}