Editing Talk:User Rights Requests and Suggestions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I made a small list of some user rights that needs to be reviewed, sorry if i forgot someone. Im considering the contribution scores as something orientative because there is people with low scores that published some unique info (it was one of the few persons in this whole able to do it, we was lucky they did it), i gave them the category of "epic edits" (whatever that means, lol is not related with wiki dedication but with the quality of his edits), there is other people (maybe not in this list) with high score because they was doing wiki manteainance/organization tasks additionally to research and/or decvelopement (btw we could make a new "R&D" user group). Im not sure if my understanding of the "VIP" group matches with yours, to me it looks like it could be used as a fallback for the users with either a higher contribution scrore or labeled as "epic editor" that became inactive (most from the list below)--[[User:Sandungas|Sandungas]] ([[User talk:Sandungas|talk]]) 06:23, 25 March 2023 (CET) | |||
I made a small list of some user rights that needs to be reviewed, sorry if i forgot someone. Im considering the contribution scores as something orientative because there is people with low scores that published some unique info (it was one of the few persons in this whole able to do it, we was lucky they did it), i gave them the category of "epic edits" (whatever that means, lol is not related with wiki dedication but with the quality of his edits), there is other people (maybe not in this list) with high score because they was doing wiki manteainance/organization tasks additionally to research and/or decvelopement (btw we could make a new "R&D" user group). Im not sure if my understanding of the "VIP" group matches with yours, to me it looks like it could be used as a fallback for the users with either a higher contribution scrore or labeled as "epic editor" that became inactive (most from the list below) | |||
nick | score | epic | active | trusted | others | nick | score | epic | active | trusted | others | ||
Line 22: | Line 19: | ||
Nikitis | medium | - | no | yes | | Nikitis | medium | - | no | yes | | ||
CrashSerious | medium | - | no | yes | | CrashSerious | medium | - | no | yes | | ||
I will make a new list for everyone available to share my suggestions and everyone is welcome for their feedback. My main goals are: | I will make a new list for everyone available to share my suggestions and everyone is welcome for their feedback. My main goals are: | ||
* Remove both inactive users from higher roles together with active users having higher roles but not using them at all (because they have a "big name" or because of a broken CAPTCHA issue on the wiki) | * Remove both inactive users from higher roles together with active users having higher roles but not using them at all (because they have a "big name" or because of a broken CAPTCHA issue on the wiki) | ||
Line 39: | Line 35: | ||
* "all" (unregistered users) | * "all" (unregistered users) | ||
* "users" / "autoconfirmed users" | * "users" / "autoconfirmed users" | ||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
* "automoderated" NEW | * "automoderated" NEW | ||
* "trusted" / "VIP" NEW | * "trusted" / "VIP" NEW | ||
Line 48: | Line 44: | ||
* "suppress" NEW | * "suppress" NEW | ||
* "bureaucrats" | * "bureaucrats" | ||
[[User:Roxanne|Roxanne]] | [[User:Roxanne|Roxanne]] | ||