Editing Talk:RSX
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
== RSX series missing == | == RSX series missing == | ||
In the transistion from RSX 40nm to 28nm sony removed the prefix "CX" and reduced the suffix " | In the transistion from RSX 40nm to 28nm sony removed the prefix "CX" and reduced the suffix "xxx" (3 optional characters in chronological order: GB -> AGB -> BGB -> CGB, etc...) to "x" (only 1 character, in chronological order: A, B, C, etc...) in the name<br> | ||
It seems the real reason why sony shorted the name this way is because in the 28nm DIE there is not enought room to etch the complete name, compare | It seems the real reason why sony shorted the name this way is because in the 28nm DIE there is not enought room to etch the complete name at the same font size, compare [[Media:RSX_CXD5302DGB_with_HYNIX_H5RS5223DFR_in_CECH-4001B_MSX-001.jpg|40nm]] with [[Media:RSX_D5305L_with_elpida_W1132BBBG_in_CECH-43xx_REX-001.jpg|28nm]]<br> | ||
So we can consider the '''D5305x''' used in the latest superslims is a ''' | So we can consider the '''D5305x''' used in the latest superslims is a '''CXD5305xxx''' and is following the same numerical sequence than the previous RSX series, the list we have is: | ||
*CXD'''2971''' | *CXD'''2971'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''2982''' | *CXD'''2982'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''2991''' | *CXD'''2991'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''5300''' | *CXD'''5300'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''5301''' | *CXD'''5301'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''5302''' | *CXD'''5302'''xxx | ||
*<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5305'''x<span style="color:#bbb"> | *<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5305'''x<span style="color:#bbb">xx</span> | ||
But this sequence indicates there is a mistery, because there are 2 series missing (5301 -> 5302 -> '''5303''' -> '''5304''' -> 5305), either is like this: | But this sequence indicates there is a mistery, because there are 2 series missing (5301 -> 5302 -> '''5303''' -> '''5304''' -> 5305), either is like this: | ||
*CXD'''2971''' | *CXD'''2971'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''2982''' | *CXD'''2982'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''2991''' | *CXD'''2991'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''5300''' | *CXD'''5300'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''5301''' | *CXD'''5301'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''5302''' | *CXD'''5302'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''5303''' | *CXD'''5303'''xxx <--- undocumented / prototype ('''41x41''' pad layout, 4*64MB VRAM) | ||
*CXD'''5304''' | *CXD'''5304'''xxx <--- undocumented / prototype ('''41x41''' pad layout, 4*64MB VRAM) | ||
*<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5305'''x<span style="color:#bbb"> | *<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5305'''x<span style="color:#bbb">xx</span> | ||
Or like this | Or like this | ||
*CXD'''2971''' | *CXD'''2971'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''2982''' | *CXD'''2982'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''2991''' | *CXD'''2991'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''5300''' | *CXD'''5300'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''5301''' | *CXD'''5301'''xxx | ||
*CXD'''5302''' | *CXD'''5302'''xxx | ||
*<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5303'''x<span style="color:#bbb"> | *<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5303'''x<span style="color:#bbb">xx</span> <--- undocumented / prototype ('''34x34''' pad layout, 2*128MB VRAM) | ||
*<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5304'''x<span style="color:#bbb"> | *<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5304'''x<span style="color:#bbb">xx</span> <--- undocumented / prototype ('''34x34''' pad layout, 2*128MB VRAM) | ||
*<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5305'''x<span style="color:#bbb"> | *<span style="color:#bbb">CX</span>D'''5305'''x<span style="color:#bbb">xx</span> |