Editing Talk:CXR713F120A
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* CXR713F120A '''GB-000''' (unknown SoftID) reported for CEB-2040/MPU-501 ...literally as "CXR713F120GB-000" but i guess that was a typo (it was missing the "A" and a space) | * CXR713F120A '''GB-000''' (unknown SoftID) reported for CEB-2040/MPU-501 ...literally as "CXR713F120GB-000" but i guess that was a typo (it was missing the "A" and a space) | ||
* CXR713F120A '''GB-004''' (<abbr title="it could be for SoftID 0B67 used by DEH-H1001-D and DEH-H1000A(S)(-E(S))">unknown SoftID</abbr>) [[Special:Diff/54194/55490|reported above]] | * CXR713F120A '''GB-004''' (<abbr title="it could be for SoftID 0B67 used by DEH-H1001-D and DEH-H1000A(S)(-E(S))">unknown SoftID</abbr>) [[Special:Diff/54194/55490|reported above]] | ||
* CXR713F120A '''GB-101''' (for SoftID | * CXR713F120A '''GB-101''' (for SoftID 03FB) used in DECR1000(A/J) | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Ok, i thought all the syscons was made by NEC/renesas but after reviewing the info in wiki i reminded are only the [[sherwood]] ones, and this talk started talking only about the [[mullion]] ones with a Sony SR11/ARM7TDMI CPU, but to be honest even with the mullions sony could have ownership of the patent of the circuitry but ask other manufacturer to build them... and that manufacturer is who "prints" the GB-xxx (with values smaller than 101) based on whatever version they programmed in the EEPROM. With values equal or bigger than 101 this rule doesnt seems to apply though, anyway this talk has been interesting, it was worthy to be mentioned incase someone wonders about that numbers in the old syscons, the reason why i started writing here was mostly because i was wondering about the groups at top of the [[Template:Motherboard_Components]] related with syscon, the splitting "by series" is something made lot of time ago that was working fine, the other day i splitted it again "by codename" and i created a new group for the [[CXR713F120A]] just as a suggestion for a posible expansion of that pages for the "F" models (incase someone decides to create more pages under that group, im not going to do it), btw, do you know if exists a [[CXR714F120A]] ? --[[User:Sandungas|Sandungas]] ([[User talk:Sandungas|talk]]) 05:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC) | Ok, i thought all the syscons was made by NEC/renesas but after reviewing the info in wiki i reminded are only the [[sherwood]] ones, and this talk started talking only about the [[mullion]] ones with a Sony SR11/ARM7TDMI CPU, but to be honest even with the mullions sony could have ownership of the patent of the circuitry but ask other manufacturer to build them... and that manufacturer is who "prints" the GB-xxx (with values smaller than 101) based on whatever version they programmed in the EEPROM. With values equal or bigger than 101 this rule doesnt seems to apply though, anyway this talk has been interesting, it was worthy to be mentioned incase someone wonders about that numbers in the old syscons, the reason why i started writing here was mostly because i was wondering about the groups at top of the [[Template:Motherboard_Components]] related with syscon, the splitting "by series" is something made lot of time ago that was working fine, the other day i splitted it again "by codename" and i created a new group for the [[CXR713F120A]] just as a suggestion for a posible expansion of that pages for the "F" models (incase someone decides to create more pages under that group, im not going to do it), btw, do you know if exists a [[CXR714F120A]] ? --[[User:Sandungas|Sandungas]] ([[User talk:Sandungas|talk]]) 05:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC) | ||